Showing posts with label No Business At All. Show all posts
Showing posts with label No Business At All. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

TP My Ass!

What direction is CLC headed - over the top or underneath it all?

"

Installation

Most of the discussion below is about household uses of toilet paper. In large buildings, there are many users, so many very competitive industrial methods exist for the use of toilet paper.

There are two common methods of installing toilet paper rolls on a toilet roll holder. Often a matter of stern debate, and a contentious problem in households with opposing viewpoints (second only to the "toilet seat up/down" debate), the variances are mainly that of personal preference.

The first method of installation has the edge of the roll facing away from the wall and commonly facing the toilet (that is, overhand). This method allows the defecator easy access to grab the toilet paper and pull off the desired amount of paper, as the roll spins toward the user. This, in fact, is the protocol advocated by the toilet paper industry itself, including at Scott Paper's factory (the inventors of toilet paper in 1907). Since the industry designs toilet paper to be used overhand, designs that are patterned, quilted or printed upon toilet paper are found on the outside of the roll; i.e. so that it is displayed. In institutions where there is a defined protocol (e.g. Marriott, Holiday Inn/InterContinental Hotels, United Airlines, the U.S. Army), the "overhand" method is specified.

The second method of installation has the edge of the roll facing the wall and commonly facing away from the toilet (underhand). This method makes it a bit more difficult for the defecator to grab the toilet paper: as the roll spins, it spins away from the user. However, there is an advantage to this method in a household with toddlers, as is makes it less likely that toilet paper will spin off the roll. This is because a toddler is most likely to spin the roll toward himself (or herself). In the case of this installation, as the roll spins toward the toddler, the paper remains wound on the roll. Yet another advantage of this method is that when the toilet paper is folded directly from the roll, it allows the embossed or printed side of the paper to face out. Many modern toilet papers are advertised as being "quilted" or "embossed", so this method would let the user take full advantage of the un-printed or un-quilted side of the product (if that is what one prefers).

A third (but far less common) toilet paper installation method is to dispense without any roller mechanism at all, or use a vertical toilet roll holder.

A fourth method involves a portable roll dispenser that encloses the roll entirely. The roll is oriented vertically, and there is an opening on the top of the container. Before installing the roll into the portable roll dispenser, the cardboard core is removed. The paper is then extracted from the center rather than the edge.

Another method of dispensing the paper does not use a roll at all. Cut sheets are stacked in a dispenser, folded in such a way that removing a sheet causes the next sheet to protrude from the dispenser. This method has the advantage that it can be refilled at any time without waiting for the supply to run out completely (as would be the case with a roll) and is therefore popular in public buildings. Cut sheet dispensers force users to help themselves to one sheet at a time, thus preventing wastefulness. They are also commonly used on rail transports where the motion of the train would cause a roll to rotate and cause a mess. This method may also be used alongside toilets that may be used by "Shomer Shabbat" Jews, some of whom do not tear on the Jewish Sabbath.

In terms of the debate, Kenn Fischburg, the President of www.ToiletPaperWorld.com states, "Many hotels install the toilet paper to pay out from over the top in order to make a nice pointed triangle on the end sheet. This points out to the user that someone cleaned the bathroom and paid attention to the 'finer' details. However, others feel that in a public facility it is best to install to pay out from underneath. In this way, the dispensing and tearing is more controlled and therefore less people will touch the roll of paper, therefore less cross contamination. Also, keeping the paper closer to the wall by dispensing from underneath provides a 'cleaner less intrusive' environment, especially in close quarters. Some dispensers have a top cover that helps the user pull and tear the paper. In this case the roll should be dispensed from the top allowing the user to 'pull up' on the paper and tear it easily. So, it depends on the dispenser, the location and the facility. However, the simple concern about the installation of the roll may have a deeper meaning and may be indicative of a different issue in the personality of the user." "

So, CLC, which direction should we take? Underneath or Over-the-top?


Monday, December 18, 2006

Credit Card: Fraud Prevention or Paranoia Presumption?

Yep. This is a long and strange trip but damn it's gonna be fun kiddies!

We found this (about irate.org) while complaining about something else (big surprise):

from

at http://www.i-rate.org/list.php

in each of the comment boxes, 1 each for each "company" listed below:

"Ripping off cc customers right & left - congress needs to take a serious look at these "companies" and fake address - although it is the addy reported by all of these Tlg* companies - vacant lot in a suburban-zoned CT area! Just use Google Earth to verify (I knew it wood eventually be good for something!)"

From the iRate.org operators:

"All local business may have ratings associated with them. Ratings are given by users of i-rate.org who share their experiences with a company so that others can benefit.

If you know the company, please contribute your own rating and comment to extend the database. "

THE BIG LIST...........(the names as listed are what appears on your credit card as a charge - usually annually and usually 99.99 USD)

Tlg Shopperadv (Watchout! This one looks as goofy as the godaddy.com website - once you are INSIDE godaddy that is)
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Healthsavr
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Complethme
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Privacygrd is somehow different from = (identitysecure) = ??
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Justforme
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Dineoneus
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Hotline = (The National Card Registry) ? AND (The National Card Registry, twice?)
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Autovantage
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Travel Adv
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Buyers Adv = GreatOptions = ?
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg Greatfun
7 Cambridge Dr

Trumbull, CT 06611


Tlg CleverClubHose

PCSafetyPlus

netmarket
(and hold your nose) (Here is even a better water-boarded-down version of this CRAP)

Pet Privileges
(This one made me laugh - yet cry)

Small Business Central

=========================


In CLC Radio's investigation, we received permission from a benefactor of CLC to include their name as their credit card had been charged by 2 (two) of the companies listed below - in just the last two months. There story is almost IDENTIcal to our benefactor's:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff92755.htm We were able to verify that the annual charges of 99.99USD EACH were credited (our benefactor used their Chase Online system and they phoned it in, just to be sure, for verification). In addition, "one" of the companies - although they are owned by the same parent company - gave our benefactor detailed instructions how to fax a request to have ALL previous annual charges credited to their account. This could realise a credit of OVER 1200.00 for both accounts combined.

That's a lot.
We think the previous and pending lawsuits account for this wild and whacky business behaviour (sometimes called "Good Business Practices")

Tlg's REAL ADDRESS:

Trilegiant (Tlg ot TLG*xxxxxx on your credit card), 100 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, CT 06850

I dig the name: Trial Giant. Aparently they are being sued by bigger giants AND WINNING?

Google Earth Search shows:
It's just North of HWY 1 on the East side in a small (3?)-story office building. But, be careful, that's probably the law office., as most Tele-marketing companies rarely would want their real addresses "out there" just to prevent any silliness.














-------------------------------
I can't decide what could be harming society more: Not knowing how EASY it is for parents to understand "L33tSpeek" or bullshit companies like "TLG*make-shit-up" MAKING SHIT UP?
--------------------------------
FROM CONSUMERAFFAIRS.com

..."Americans didn't ask to be touched, which has led to all kinds of lawsuits and complaints, including a late-2006 settlement that will result in at least $8 million in restitution payments to angry consumers.

TLG is a spin-off of Cendant, a huge direct-marketing/membership venture that does business under such names as

  • AOL AutoVantage
  • AOL Credit Alert
  • AOL Netmarket
  • AOL Travelers Advantage
  • AutoVantage
  • Buyers Advantage
  • Citishopper
  • Clever Clubhouse
  • CompleteHome
  • Credentials Services
  • Dental Plus Group Plan
  • Digital ProtectionPlus
  • Dinner On Us Club
  • Family FunSaver Club
  • Great Fun
  • Great Options
  • Health Saver
  • Homeowners Savings Network
  • Hot-Line
  • Identity Secure
  • Just For Me
  • Macy's Hot-Line
  • National Card Registry
  • Netmarket
  • OurCompleteHome.com
  • Pet Privileges
  • PrivacyGuard
  • Sears Discount Travel Club
  • Shoppers Advantage
  • Small Business Central
  • Today's Homeowner Values
  • Travel ER
  • Travelers Advantage"
  • BitchSlapYoAsset
  • "Trilegiant retains a strong connection to Cendant Marketing Group, its corporate parent. Here's how Cendant describes itself:

    The Cendant Marketing Group is a global leader in the membership, insurance and loyalty marketing businesses, delivering products and services that touch the lives of millions worldwide. The group is part of the Cendant Marketing Services Division, which includes Trilegiant, Progeny Marketing Innovations, Trilegiant Loyalty Solutions and Cendant International Marketing Services (Cims), and designs, develops and implements strategies and programs serving more than 100 million consumers around the world."

    "In a properly ironic twist, Trilegiant hired con-man-turned-FBI consultant Frank Abagnale as its spokesman for PrivacyGuard."

    http://www.consumeraffairs.com/scam_alerts/trilegiant_complaints.html

    "Trilegiant
    Chase Bank, Triligent, Settle Negative Option Fraud Charges
    Inside Trilegiant's Marketing Machine
    Connecticut Sues Trilegiant
    California Sues Chase, Trilegiant
    Trilegiant Settles with Florida (Thanks, Jeb)
    About Trilegiant
    Consumer Complaints"



    http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2005/ct_trilegiant.html

    "July 12, 2005
    Connecticut is suing Trilegiant for for allegedly deceiving consumers into enrolling in its many travel and affinity clubs."

    ------------------------
    And now for something a little more serious:

    Girard Gibbs, complex litigation attorneys


    http://www.girardgibbs.com/consumercases.asp#sony
    (well, come on, it's Digital Audio related, and that's what CLC Radio is all about)

    ----------------------
    TRILEGIANT's companies' websites ALL use the dreaded ehg. cookies - tracking-whores of the internet.

    That is why - for a short time - we have included links to all the company websites. WHY? Because we want them to KNOW it was CLC Radio that helped bring them down to Google Earth, where the rest of us work, live, and play. Go to sleep, Big Company, go to sleep..........you've worked hard and long enough. That many lawsuits would give Bill Gates a headache.

    We wonder who their ISP might be:

    Registrant:
    Trilegiant Corporation
    100 Connecticut Avenue
    Norwalk, CT 06850
    US

    Domain Name: SHOPPERSADVANTAGE.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    Admin, Domain trilegiant@dglaw.com
    1740 Broadway
    c/o Davis & Gilbert LLP
    New York, NY 10019
    US
    +1.2124684800 fax: +1.2124684888

    Technical Contact:
    Master, Host hostmaster@affiniongroup.com
    40 Oakview Drive
    Trumbull, CT 06611
    US
    +1.2034162000 fax: +1.2034167023

    Record expires on 24-Jan-2007.
    Record created on 23-Jan-1996.
    Database last updated on 19-Dec-2006 00:47:39 EST.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS.TRILEGIANT.COM 204.155.122.66
    NS2.TRILEGIANT.COM 204.155.124.66
    NS3.TRILEGIANT.COM 204.155.124.67
    NS4.TRILEGIANT.COM 204.155.123.69

    =====================EOT
    The above info is PUBLIC.

    I'm putting in my bid for their domain names on hold - just kidding (but, should I?)

    But, looking at the technical contact (http://www.affiniongroup.com/) tells us that this big company could be owned by an even bigger company (big surprise, eh?) OR perhaps all they did was build the websites seen above.
    The latter is more likely and hopefully the truth behind the curtain, as:
    http://www3.cybertrust.com/cert_info/certified.shtml?CERTID=070506J800#

    OR mnaybe not, as:
    http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-13-2006/0004318616&EDATE=

    OR maybe there is a little dissention in the ranks of MERGERS & ACUISITIONS?

    (as if I could care) BUT HERE IS FUN - what the website USED to look like, but it's still "out there" http://www.ncci.cendant.com/
    (Confused now?)

    and the law department might be DG LAW? or something like it (using the Admin contact as a guide)?

    http://www.dglaw.com/

    (now THESE guys have a COOOOL website SPLASH page, and since they seem to be into the IP stuff, we might just STEAL their webpage code for it!) APPARENTLY this firm does it ALL - just like Sams Club!

    -----------------------
    Well pardon my Canadian French - but why are these TrileGiant Fuck-holes still in business?

    OK, I guess I'm pissed. And that was a rhetorical question!
    ------------------------
    Now. Since most of us are all in school, here is some more CRAP to look at after you get tired of all your Chanuka presents:

    FROM FORBES ARTICLE:

    http://www.forbes.com/prnewswire/feeds/prnewswire/2006/10/26/prnewswire200610260900PR_NEWS_B_MWT_CL_CLTH511.html

    And now back to reality:
    http://www.ripoffreport.com/results.asp?q1=ALL&q4=&q6=&q3=&q2=&q7=&searchtype=0&submit2=Search!&q5=TLG+GREATFN

    -
    -

    Friday, October 06, 2006

    CONSULT THIS!

    AT CLC, the Grand Illusionists known as Sungard, have BUCKED our bandwidth deal for Internet speed-of-access.

    Apparently we are now all sharing a 100mbps connection (over at least 2 OC3's - if not, more) instead of the GB connection we have enjoyed until only a week ago! This translates o 10MBps as opposed to 100MBps we were getting - and even that is a joke compared to ALL OTHER COMMUNITY COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN ILLINOIS!

    BULL, SHIT.

    I know who to talk to to get either our GB back, or put Rat's office on a 28.8 modem for the rest of his limited contract here. Don't think it won't happen. You want to talk productivity? You just KILLED productivity.

    Now, it looks like I am going to be here to 4am regularly instead of 2 am. Kevin's gonna LOVE that.

    Thanks a lot ASSHOLE! I can't even get the meebo clients to function properly.

    Do you honestly think you are saving the college money? Think about saving your contract renewal for consulting. You SHOULD have consulted with END USERS FIRST - you are NOT the end users of the Internet, anymore than an Administrator would be (and certainly less). That is the first rule of consulting: KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE.

    I can't WAIT to see how pissed off the board members are going to be when they can't get remote access to CLC services in the TIMELY MANNER THEY'VE EXPECTED AND RECEIVED. Forget about Dick being able to deal with it. I mean, it's not like you are going to give them any special privlededges (ie; extra-special bandwidth) - as that would violate CLC's Ethics Policy.

    You know what? Do you even have a Masters degree? You are making decisions WITHOUT consulting the people who need the bandwidth.

    Distance learning?
    IPTV?
    Are you fuckin' kidding us?
    STUDENT SELF SERVICE REGISTRATION? PEOPLESOFT - the GUI ALONE!

    ORACLE BACK-END REMOTE ACCESS DATA ACQUISITIONS?

    There are even more serious consequences that you have not though of - and for ethical reasons I cannot mention here. Morons of Collegis unite, and leave CLC.

    0-------------------

    And this thought, too:

    Sungard (who merged with Collegis last Summer?) uses on their website, the Looooooongest cookie I have ever seen. This alone could be an attempt at a DOS Attack!

    Anyway, the cookie is certified by Omniture, a company big on webstats. Omniture also has the customer Cancer Treatment Centers of America to Improve Online Patient Care with Omniture SiteCatalyst Read more...

    That is scary. And it's almost Halloween, kids!

    So, with this new Slooooow speed internet access UP or DOWN load, can you just imagine how happy all of you would be if clcradio.org was hosted ON SITE at CLC?

    Holy Crap, Batman! Yep. Last December 2005, there was actually a committee of the Information Technology Commission of CLC that had minutes of a meeting (AQIP allows for all open session meeting minutes to be made public - not just published) asking the question: Should CLC clubs pay outside for their websites?

    My answer is YES - it's called OUT SOURCING. If the admins want so much for certain things to be out-sourced, website hosting is the MOST COMMON among outsourced things. And, yet we are actually , now, going to outsource a wall measuring 8' high by 20' long by 5" thick.

    I want a tax break.